Which statement about pro-drop languages is incorrect according to the material?

Which statement about pro-drop languages is incorrect according to the material?

• A. Pronouns may be omitted when they are pragmatically inferable.
• B. English is a non-pro-drop language.
• C. In commands, subject pronouns are often omitted.
• D. Pronouns must always be present in every sentence.

Answer: (D)

Pro-drop languages allow subjects to be omitted when the verb form or the surrounding context makes who is speaking clear. Because of that, pronouns can be dropped, especially when the meaning can be inferred pragmatically or from the verb’s inflection. This is why saying pronouns must always be present in every sentence is not correct. English is typically treated as non-pro-drop, with explicit subjects in ordinary declaratives. In commands, many languages permit omitting the subject pronoun since the imperative form already carries the instruction to “you.” So the statement about pronouns always needing to be present clashes with how pro-drop systems operate.

Pro-drop languages allow subjects to be omitted when the verb form or the surrounding context makes who is speaking clear. Because of that, pronouns can be dropped, especially when the meaning can be inferred pragmatically or from the verb’s inflection. This is why saying pronouns must always be present in every sentence is not correct. English is typically treated as non-pro-drop, with explicit subjects in ordinary declaratives. In commands, many languages permit omitting the subject pronoun since the imperative form already carries the instruction to “you.” So the statement about pronouns always needing to be present clashes with how pro-drop systems operate.